Calories Publix Roast Beef Sub Sub

The fear of wiretapping

Who's Afraid of the wiretaps in Italy?

The debate in the past week came in the climax, on a more general reform of the justice which - if desired Government forces - seems to be right now just shared.

Berlusconi and then lined up all his followers certainly watching with concern the current rules governing the judicial power of investigation related to wiretapping, this seems like a given unequivocal. Perhaps because, as someone noted - see the smooth Antonio Di Pietro - the problem is that the intercepts bother those who have the conscience a little dirty or who, although not the nobility of feeling in this state 'mind, must act to make sure that this tool gives the least possible discomfort. The intercepts in fact can not be a concern or a nuisance by those who do their business honestly, they are for those who can perform or act unlawfully. It dimostasse otherwise.

Knight and Alfano argue that a limit should be placed. But I wonder a limit to what and why? Because they cost too much? The question is also the response of the PDL. Besides, who is against

brings up privacy. An excuse like in the era of computerization, digitization and new technological means of communication is a little ridiculous if only because now the communication between individuals is based overwhelmingly on these new media (internet included). Protecting your personal information seems to me a substantial idiocy that can not stand when it comes to judicial investigations.

course you can also include a limit and no one discusses. Yet looking at the words of the Chief Prosecutor Caselli we see that the data on the use of this investigative tool, to date, are still very small (only 0.20%).

The power of assessment relating to wiretapping, should judges and bodies to ensure that justice is essential . But not only for crimes against human beings, as argued by the elite of the judiciary, the inauguration of the judicial year. We think it is useful and essential for all other offenses. Not only against the crimes and criminal organizations.

So when Di Pietro insists on the issue of wiretapping as well as all the other related to justice - more severe penalties on the one hand and the certainty of punishment itself which is opposed to impunity in the other - we can only totally supportive of him and if he seems a bit "populist" in his way to outsource their opinions and scream, as many have said (including the left and center-left), it is also true that his reasons, besides consistent are as plausible and legitimate grounds.
conclude with his words: "those who have nothing to hide, no fear of being intercepted." (A. Di Pietro).